[13265] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (NetSurfer)
Fri Oct 31 21:08:27 1997

Date: Fri, 31 Oct 1997 16:04:59 -1000 (HST)
From: NetSurfer <netsurf@pixi.com>
To: Matt Ryan <matt@planet.net.uk>
cc: Barry Shein <bzs@world.std.com>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <matt-971030101738.A0218158@banana.planet.net.uk>


On Thu, 30 Oct 1997, Matt Ryan wrote:

> If people are having trouble with their mailservers dying under the spammers
> attack(!) then I would suggest they need a more scalable system.

If the spammers argue that they have a right to send a machine 4000+
messages then why is it mail bombing when someone retaliates and sends the
spammer 4000+ messages?  Do the spammers need a more scalable system?

-
James D. Wilson
netsurf@pixi.com



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post