[132645] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joe Provo)
Mon Nov 29 23:08:56 2010
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 23:08:53 -0500
From: Joe Provo <nanog-post@rsuc.gweep.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <20101130040327.GC56911@ussenterprise.ufp.org>
Reply-To: nanog-post@rsuc.gweep.net
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 08:03:27PM -0800, Leo Bicknell wrote:
[snip]
> If the FCC wanted to do something useful they would look at the
> combined ratio of all /customers/ of an ISP, and then require their
> peering policy to allow for around 2x of that.
[snip]
...or maybe not get involved in peering policies at all? DO we
really want regulatory oversight here, happily driving traffic away
from the US?
--
RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE
