[132636] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Mon Nov 29 22:22:39 2010
In-Reply-To: <20101129235957.GA44875@ussenterprise.ufp.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 22:22:34 -0500
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org> wrote:
> No one will ever be in ratio compliance with an eyeball dominant
> network. =A0Ever. =A0 Period. =A0It's not possible via technology and
> TOS. =A0Enforcing it as an eyeball network just forces content providers
> to aquire eyeballs, e.g. compete with you. =A0That's bad business.
see craig's report from nanog47:
<http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog47/presentations/Monday/Labovitz_Observ=
eReport_N47_Mon.pdf>
not for a time has Comcast been solely an 'eye-ball' network... or so
they think.
-chris
(I don't disagree with leo's stance, though I'm not a peering person
so I really try never to know how all of that magic works)
