[132611] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: experience with equinix exchange
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mehmet Akcin)
Mon Nov 29 18:51:56 2010
From: Mehmet Akcin <mehmet@akcin.net>
In-Reply-To: <06A1E929-CF1A-4E87-87C8-E79FA5B340B1@ianai.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 15:51:44 -0800
To: Patrick W. Gilmore <patrick@ianai.net>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Nov 29, 2010, at 1:39 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> Even combined, no. It's north of 700 Gbps though. I am assuming they =
have combined S&D into the graph, though:
>=20
> <https://ix.equinix.com/peeringstats/userHome.do?action=3Dhome>
>=20
> Given that Any2 is in the 200 range, Equinix is clearly more - more =
than all four combined.
>=20
> But all the traffic on every Equinix and PAIX switch combined, is =
still lower than the traffic on any one of the three large exchanges in =
Europe. It really is all about the PNIs.
>=20
I wonder how is NOTA like, do they ever make the traffic info public?
Mehmet=
