[132593] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Level 3 Communications Issues Statement Concerning Comcast's

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brandon Galbraith)
Mon Nov 29 17:56:34 2010

In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinaLeSxP5_8vu_0JjBXzs8KpPpA7yLoStW70i=T@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:52:02 -0600
From: Brandon Galbraith <brandon.galbraith@gmail.com>
To: Mark Wall <ospfisisis@gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 4:46 PM, Mark Wall <ospfisisis@gmail.com> wrote:

> Between the lines: Comcast wants to end mutual peering agreements (due to:
> ratios, politics , greed) but we are going to spin it due to net neutrality
>  making it main stream media and hoping we can get comcast clients to
> complain...
>
> Not the worse angle we've seen
>
>
> >
> >
>

Is L3 really pushing more streaming traffic than LLNW? Is ending
settlement-free peering with Google (Youtube) coming down the pipeline?

-- 
Brandon Galbraith
US Voice: 630.492.0464

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post