[132567] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Cacti Bandwidth Monitoring
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo)
Mon Nov 29 09:39:40 2010
In-Reply-To: <4CF3B796.3040006@altechstream.rw>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 12:39:34 -0200
From: Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo <carlosm3011@gmail.com>
To: Peter Rudasingwa <peter.rudasingwa@altechstream.rw>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
You need to use 64 bit counters. Here you can find more info:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk648/tk362/technologies_q_and_a_item09186a00800b69ac.shtml
The problem is that at 150 mbps 32 bit counters roll-over at least
twice in the 5 min interval.
Warm regards
Carlos Martinez
LACNIC
Uruguay
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Peter Rudasingwa
<peter.rudasingwa@altechstream.rw> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a cacti server running and it has been working fine so far except for
> one interface which has an average of 150Mbps going through it now. Before
> when I had less than 120Mbps I got proper graphs but of late it gives me
> graphs of 20Mbps when it should be giving me the correct reading (150Mbps).
>
> Is there a maximum bandwidth it graphs or can this be edited so that I get
> proper graphs?
> --
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Peter Rudasingwa
>
> *ALTECH STREAM RWANDA Ltd*
> ICT Park
> Boulevard de L'Umuganda
> P.O.Box 6098
> Kigali, Rwanda
> Telephone: (+250) 580532/5
> Mobile: (+250) 0788406685
> ------------------------------------
> *Affordable Broadband Solutions*
>
--
--
=========================
Carlos M. Martinez-Cagnazzo
http://cagnazzo.name
=========================
