|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 10:35:17 -0500 From: Curtis Maurand <cmaurand@xyonet.com> To: nanog@nanog.org In-Reply-To: <78E40B97-2F78-4A02-8535-32CE6229F15E@hopcount.ca> Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org On 11/22/2010 10:25 AM, Joe Abley wrote: > > You don't think > > "(i) a service provider, as that term is defined in section 512(k)(1) of title 17, United States Code, or other operator of a domain name system server shall take reasonable steps that will prevent a domain name from resolving to that domain name’s Internet protocol address;" > > could be taken as a requirement for providers to intercept attempts to use off-network DNS resolvers and manage such requests to meet the end goal above? > > Given that many providers already do this (for whatever reason), it's not much of a stretch to see someone declaring that such behaviour falls under the umbrella of "reasonable steps". > > I'm not suggesting that I think any of this is reasonable or sensible, but it does seem to imply an operational burden on service providers. > > And where would the list that we need to block be gotten from? --Curtis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |