[132222] in North American Network Operators' Group
more wardrobe options
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com)
Thu Nov 18 14:09:27 2010
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 19:08:32 +0000
From: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
To: Steve Miller <stmille@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=_E7Z=BQH9XtjbM7OXwQ7HoOm9RXyKpbHBk73L@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>, Mehmet Akcin <mehmet@akcin.net>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
http://www.isc.org/store/logoware-clothing/isc-9-layer-osi-model-cotton-t-shirt
--bill
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 11:01:39AM -0800, Steve Miller wrote:
> politics, finance...
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Paul WALL <pauldotwall@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > What are the layer 8-9 issues?
> >
> > Drive Slow,
> > Paul Wall
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Mehmet Akcin <mehmet@akcin.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Nov 18, 2010, at 12:48 PM, Shacolby Jackson wrote:
> > >
> > >> Has anyone had any experience (good or bad) with their exchange at any
> > of
> > >> their major datacenters, especially Great Oaks? We're wondering if
> > people
> > >> really love or hate it.
> > >>
> > >> -shac
> > >
> > >
> > > Equinix does a fair job running 7 layers , however the layer8 and layer9
> > seem the lacking part
> > > which could have been improved greatly. in Great Oaks / SJC , they seem
> > to be the largest IX
> > >
> > > per
> > >
> > >
> > https://www.peeringdb.com/private/exchange_view.php?id=5&peerParticipantsPublicsOrder=Sorter_policy&peerParticipantsPublicsDir=DESC
> > >
> > > so being there while you are in that location seems good, and they are
> > reliable.
> > >
> > > mehmet
> > >
> >
> >
