[132187] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 Space Management. Tracking, not Allocating
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Shahid Shafi)
Wed Nov 17 12:36:43 2010
In-Reply-To: <B925B320C2655641ADBBFC00B1F0B82003B37A09@ukbb3.ukbroadband.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 09:32:09 -0800
From: Shahid Shafi <sshafi@gmail.com>
To: Leigh Porter <leigh.porter@ukbroadband.com>
Cc: nanog <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I want to add couple of more questions to this discussion if it's ok with C=
hip.
Are you all trying to get PI address space or PA is workable too. How
are you planning to do multihoming with IPv6?
Thanks
Shahid
On Wednesday, November 17, 2010, Leigh Porter
<leigh.porter@ukbroadband.com> wrote:
> Darn it, I thought IPv6 managed all that kind of stuff automatically ?
>
> You mean I still have to do some work?
>
> ;-)
>
> --
> Leigh
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: chip [mailto:chip.gwyn@gmail.com]
> Sent: 17 November 2010 17:23
> To: nanog
> Subject: IPv6 Space Management. Tracking, not Allocating
>
> There's been lots of discussion on how we should allocate space to
> various
> bits of the network. =A0What I haven't yet seen is how people are trackin=
g
> these allocations. =A0Is everyone using one of the two or three commercia=
l
> applications or some OSS solution or a few large(ish) text files?
> Anyone
> have any recommendations or feedback?
>
> Thanks!
>
> --chip
>
> --
> Just my $.02, your mileage may vary, =A0batteries not included, etc....
>
>
