[131931] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [j-nsp] EX4200 JunOS Recommendation
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (GIULIANO (UOL))
Mon Nov 8 16:41:32 2010
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2010 19:41:07 -0200
From: "GIULIANO (UOL)" <giulianocm@uol.com.br>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin69DYVxee5nQHiAxgT-Q4O3ecDPw620pirr0en@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: giulianocm@uol.com.br
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
We are running 10.2R3 for 10 x EX4200.
Everything is working fine ... from VC to BGP and virtual routers.
> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Richard A Steenbergen <ras@e-gerbil.net>wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 11:43:55AM -0800, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
>>> Hi Keegan,
>>>
>>> I always try to go with
>>>
>>>
>> https://www.juniper.net/customers/csc/software/junos_software_versions.jsp
>>
>> Based on past experience, I find this list to be a giant load of horse
>> shit. You'd have better luck picking good versions of code with a magic
>> 8ball.
>
>
> hahahahah For one, I don't think I would have taken that quite as seriously
> coming from anyone else. Secondly I'm new here, but it's better than NANOG.
>
>
>> Unfortunately I can't tell you specifically what works best for
>> L2 on EX4200 because we use none of the first and very little of the
>> second, but I can give you a very very long list of reasons why 10.2R3
>> is (at this exact moment) the best choice for EX8200 doing routing.
>>
>
> We use the big cats for this but this may help someone I know. Thanks.
>
>>
>> --
>> Richard A Steenbergen <ras@e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
>> GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
