[131918] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: RINA - scott whaps at the nanog hornets nest :-)

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mans Nilsson)
Mon Nov 8 06:39:14 2010

Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 12:38:53 +0100
From: Mans Nilsson <mansaxel@besserwisser.org>
To: George Bonser <gbonser@seven.com>
In-Reply-To: <5A6D953473350C4B9995546AFE9939EE0B14C7ED@RWC-EX1.corp.seven.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org


--jcZk2Ix8j3PVOBnV
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Subject: RE: RINA - scott whaps at the nanog hornets nest :-) Date: Sun, No=
v 07, 2010 at 12:34:56AM -0700 Quoting George Bonser (gbonser@seven.com):
>=20
> Yes, I really don't understand that either.  You would think that the
> investment in developing and deploying all that SONET infrastructure
> has been paid back by now and they can lower the prices dramatically.
> One would think the vendors would be practically giving it away,
> particularly if people understood the potential improvement in
> performance, though the difference between 1500 and 4000 is probably
> not all that much except on long distance ( >2000km ) paths.

Even if larger MTUen are interesting (but most of the time not worth
the work) the sole reason I like SDH  as my WAN technology is the
presence of signalling -- so that both ends of a link are aware of its
status near-instantly (via protocol parts like RDI etc). In GE it is
legal to not receive any packets, which means that "oblivious" is a
possible state for such a connection. With associated routing
implications.

--=20
M=C3=A5ns Nilsson     primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina
MN-1334-RIPE                             +46 705 989668
Is this the line for the latest whimsical YUGOSLAVIAN drama which also
makes you want to CRY and reconsider the VIETNAM WAR?

--jcZk2Ix8j3PVOBnV
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (SunOS)

iEYEARECAAYFAkzX4U0ACgkQ02/pMZDM1cUv9QCgj3yiD9oQCbPLccxsFy747Fdm
TcUAn26smKZSBJcwTebIR41TaCmNgy83
=iBpR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--jcZk2Ix8j3PVOBnV--


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post