[131902] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: RINA - scott whaps at the nanog hornets nest :-)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Richard A Steenbergen)
Sun Nov 7 02:51:49 2010
Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2010 01:51:45 -0600
From: Richard A Steenbergen <ras@e-gerbil.net>
To: George Bonser <gbonser@seven.com>
In-Reply-To: <5A6D953473350C4B9995546AFE9939EE0B14C7ED@RWC-EX1.corp.seven.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 12:34:56AM -0700, George Bonser wrote:
>
> Yes, I really don't understand that either. You would think that the
> investment in developing and deploying all that SONET infrastructure
> has been paid back by now and they can lower the prices dramatically.
> One would think the vendors would be practically giving it away,
> particularly if people understood the potential improvement in
> performance, though the difference between 1500 and 4000 is probably
> not all that much except on long distance ( >2000km ) paths.
Careful, you're rapidly working your way up to nanog kook status with
these absurd claims based on no logic whatsoever.
--
Richard A Steenbergen <ras@e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras
GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)
