[13179] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Spam Control Considered Harmful
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Peterson)
Thu Oct 30 04:44:02 1997
From: Paul Peterson <paulp@winterlan.com>
To: "'nanog@merit.edu'" <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 01:31:14 -0800
How about a new RFC outlining a method of dynamically delivering a relay
host native to whatever service provider you dial in to ?? That way, any
e-mail can be traced to a supposedly responsible end-user by the
victimized ISP ??
Naaaaa.
Paul.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: woods@most.weird.com [SMTP:woods@most.weird.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 1997 9:47 PM
> To: John A. Tamplin
> Cc: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
>
> [ On Wed, October 29, 1997 at 21:53:52 (-0600), John A. Tamplin wrote:
> ]
> > Subject: Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful
> >
> >[....]
> > The difficulty in the latter is finding a way to determine what SMTP
> servers
> > they are supposed to have access to and then implementing that in a
> router
> > access list.
>
> There should be no difficulty at all in doing this. If they dial into
> your network then they use your outgoing mail relay server, and yours
> alone. Period. (Unless you have some kind of agreement in a roaming
> system where you authenticate your own users to someone else's dial-up
> and vice versa, in which case you only allow the user to connect to
> the
> the "home" ISP's mail relay host(s).)
>
> --
> Greg A. Woods
>
> +1 416 443-1734 VE3TCP <gwoods@acm.org>
> <robohack!woods>
> Planix, Inc. <woods@planix.com>; Secrets of the Weird
> <woods@weird.com>
