[131752] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Failover IPv6 with multiple PA prefixes (Was: IPv6 fc00::/7 -
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Karl Auer)
Tue Nov 2 18:26:38 2010
From: Karl Auer <kauer@biplane.com.au>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <75FEF9D8-18E0-4527-A551-4F9DFC2E8B26@delong.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 09:26:22 +1100
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--=-oK78fS7XltJH1o72HWJI
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 09:03 -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
> > About the only hack I can see that *might* make sense would be that hom=
e
> > CPE does NOT honour the upstream lifetimes if upstream connectivity is
> > lost, but instead keeps the prefix alive on very short lifetimes until
> > upstream connectivity returns.
> >=20
> Which is exactly what was being proposed when Tim responded that it
> would break the IPv6 spec.
Yes it does. But as long as there is no upstream connectivity, it
doesn't matter. Personally I don't think it makes a *lot* of sense, but
it does make some.
Regards, K.
--=20
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Karl Auer (kauer@biplane.com.au) +61-2-64957160 (h)
http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer/ +61-428-957160 (mob)
GPG fingerprint: B386 7819 B227 2961 8301 C5A9 2EBC 754B CD97 0156
Old fingerprint: 07F3 1DF9 9D45 8BCD 7DD5 00CE 4A44 6A03 F43A 7DEF
--=-oK78fS7XltJH1o72HWJI
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEABECAAYFAkzQkA4ACgkQLrx1S82XAVYsdgCfXa/XkAFbIQu3E96oLzoGGgcG
frYAoKobpfAgIFrQKCzrm6QdZKM2vdMH
=tMGz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-oK78fS7XltJH1o72HWJI--
