[131651] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Mystery open source switching company claims top-of-rack price
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul WALL)
Sun Oct 31 21:07:08 2010
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTing7rf84KK_R9_VHbm41bHppWt0t_uiMGXdt8Jr@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 21:07:01 -0400
From: Paul WALL <pauldotwall@gmail.com>
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
I don't know what the big deal is. I've rolled at least 20 of these
switches into my network, and not only are they more stable than the
Centillion switches that they replaced, they only cost half as much.
Most of the money I dropped was on converting my stations from token
ring to ethernet.
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 6:59 PM, bas <kilobit@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 11:26 PM, Kevin Oberman <oberman@es.net> wrote:
>> I might also mention that I received private SPAM from a name we all
>> know and loath. (Hint: He's been banned from NANOG for VERY good
>> reason and his name is of French derivation.) I just added a filter to
>> block any mail mentioning pica8 and will see no more of this thread or
>> their spam.
>
> Same here.
> He harvests email addresses from peeringdb. (I have slight typo's in
> my peeringdb record to recognize harvested spams.)
>
> Bas
>
>
