[131635] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Topic: Inter-AS BGP Local Preference Matrix
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Sun Oct 31 10:22:27 2010
To: "Rettke, Brian" <Brian.Rettke@cableone.biz>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 29 Oct 2010 09:55:06 PDT."
<96CA80CDCD822B4F9B41FB3A109C9359A3E64802CF@E2K7MAILBOX1.corp.cableone.net>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 10:21:44 -0400
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1288534904_5109P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Fri, 29 Oct 2010 09:55:06 PDT, "Rettke, Brian" said:
> It's obviously something that each of us would need to do individually, but
> I'm wondering if there is any way this could become a de facto standard,
> or could be a method that the community at large could enforce somehow.
Alice's Restaurant.
If one customer asks for it, if two ask for it, if 50 ask for it...
Just put your requirements into the RFP, and make it clear your $$ are going to
the outfit that does the best on your list of 6 requirements. Remind the
losers of this. Get 49 of your friends to put it in RFP's too. The providers
are *not* going to do something like this unless there's a good economic basis
for doing it.
--==_Exmh_1288534904_5109P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFMzXt4cC3lWbTT17ARAqtxAJ4pKyHMfh7BDxlyno92h2x14x+ZbwCgxRdX
JoE/CRePAIZqplz9nEp1wDU=
=kjgK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1288534904_5109P--
