[131541] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Franck Martin)
Tue Oct 26 19:04:07 2010
X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: franck@genius.com
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 11:03:54 +1200 (FJT)
From: Franck Martin <franck@genius.com>
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <B67BF8A6-1DFE-4EF9-9A64-A36C6E37C185@delong.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Owen DeLong" <owen@delong.com>
> To: "Franck Martin" <franck@genius.com>
> Cc: "Randy Carpenter" <rcarpen@network1.net>, nanog@nanog.org
> Sent: Wednesday, 27 October, 2010 11:48:58 AM
> Subject: Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated?
> It's very interesting to me that wee keep discussing RIRs other than
> ARIN when
> talking about allocation policies and issues for NANOG.
>
> The NA in NANOG puts the vast majority of it within the ARIN service
> region. The
> only other RIR which has territory within NA has not even been
> mentioned until
> now and that is LACNIC. (I'm afraid I am not yet familiar with their
> current IPv6
> policies or practices).
>
"Cute but not too bright" The Oracle (The Matrix)
