[131533] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (George Bonser)
Tue Oct 26 16:36:00 2010
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:35:48 -0700
In-Reply-To: <A9F22BBD-A660-4EFB-9500-ACC43D0D5F4E@gizmopartners.com>
From: "George Bonser" <gbonser@seven.com>
To: "Chris Boyd" <cboyd@gizmopartners.com>,
"NANOG" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> From: Chris Boyd=20
> Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 1:08 PM
> To: NANOG
> Subject: Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated?
>=20
>=20
> I beleive Jack said that they have redundant connections to his
> network. I took that to mean that they did not multihome to different
> AS.
Ok, that is where my mental disconnect came from. I saw the word
"multihomed" and took that to mean homed to two different providers, not
dual connections to the same.
=20
> Such arrangements are not uncommon. =20
Indeed. We do that in a couple of places, too.
