[131507] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nick Hilliard)
Tue Oct 26 13:22:42 2010
X-Envelope-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:22:22 +0100
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
To: Jack Bates <jbates@brightok.net>
In-Reply-To: <4CC70DA2.6020906@brightok.net>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 26/10/2010 18:19, Jack Bates wrote:
> My minimum /30 allocation per ARIN met a /27 in HD-Ratio thresholds. To not
> be given the threshold space means no reservations for subtending ISPs, no
> room for subtending ISPs to grow, and multiple assignments. If ARIN only
> does /29 boundaries, I'll also be getting multiple /29's, and not just
> working within a /27 per the HD-Ratio guidelines.
If the policy is broken, then submit a policy proposal to fix it.
Nick
