[131407] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 fc00::/7 ??? Unique local addresses
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo)
Sat Oct 23 11:04:03 2010
In-Reply-To: <20101022133804.GA49113@ussenterprise.ufp.org>
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 13:03:55 -0200
From: Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo <carlosm3011@gmail.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Amen!
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org> wrote:
>
> There are some folks (like me) who advocate a DHCPv6 that can convey
> a default gateway AND the ability to turn off RA's entirely. That
> is make it work like IPv4.
>
>
I'd also love to turn off stateless autoconfig altogether and not be coerced
to assign /64s to single LANs, which I am becoming convinced that it was a
poor decision on the IETFs part.
Stateless autoconfig works very well, It would be just perfect if the
network boundary was configurable (like say /64 if you really want it, or
/80 - /96 for the rest of us)
cheers
Carlos
--
--
=========================
Carlos M. Martinez-Cagnazzo
http://cagnazzo.name
=========================
