[131391] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 fc00::/7 =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=94?= Unique local addresses
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Karl Auer)
Fri Oct 22 18:27:53 2010
From: Karl Auer <kauer@biplane.com.au>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <20101023034834.15fec97c@opy.nosense.org>
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 09:27:44 +1100
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
--=-0GIt0GSys5CzKqKgZpCd
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, 2010-10-23 at 03:48 +1030, Mark Smith wrote:
> An RA is single, periodic, in the order of 100s of seconds, multicast
> packet. If you're arguing against the cost of that, then I think you're
> being a bit too precious with your packets.
Just to be clear on this: I was taking issue solely with the idea that
DHCPv6 requires RA. It doesn't.
Regards, K.
--=20
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Karl Auer (kauer@biplane.com.au) +61-2-64957160 (h)
http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer/ +61-428-957160 (mob)
GPG fingerprint: B386 7819 B227 2961 8301 C5A9 2EBC 754B CD97 0156
Old fingerprint: 07F3 1DF9 9D45 8BCD 7DD5 00CE 4A44 6A03 F43A 7DEF
--=-0GIt0GSys5CzKqKgZpCd
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEABECAAYFAkzCD+AACgkQLrx1S82XAVaw8gCgjnZ450ZpnY2aeOoU40FMzbtR
x74An3oEXEv3WN2Q5JEooBpLOwdGU4Fo
=qzuC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-0GIt0GSys5CzKqKgZpCd--
