[131359] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Only 5x IPv4 /8 remaining at IANA
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joe Maimon)
Fri Oct 22 11:58:26 2010
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 11:58:13 -0400
From: Joe Maimon <jmaimon@ttec.com>
To: Ben Butler <ben.butler@c2internet.net>
In-Reply-To: <FD55067F70105D4BBDBE7FC036661C00012D500A3B63@EXCHANGE.atlasbiz.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Ben Butler wrote:
>
> If we, as a community of operators are going to get on and deploy IPv6 and we agree it's a migration the lets get doing and set some targets dates / BCP for when it is reasonably expected that net/sys admins will have completed the rollout and by whatever contractual or commercial / technical means migrated their customers. If, however, we as a community don't want migration but cohabitation then lets do that. Which one do we ultimately want?
>
> Ben
>
The key word in the phrase collective self interest is self. Solve that
first, the rest comes along for the ride.
There is no cabal.
Joe
