[131308] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 fc00::/7 =?windows-1252?Q?=97_Unique_local_addres?=
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jack Bates)
Thu Oct 21 22:06:28 2010
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 21:05:35 -0500
From: Jack Bates <jbates@brightok.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=PNWVQV_=f9P8np0PW9Ojw0AX70+pFsYMtndRj@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 10/21/2010 8:39 PM, Ray Soucy wrote:
>
> How so? We still have RA (with a high priority) that's the only way
> DHCPv6 works. I guess there is a lot of misunderstanding about how
> DHCPv6 works, even among the experts...
Actually, the last I checked, there are implementation of DHCPv6 without RA.
Jack
