[131283] in North American Network Operators' Group
=?windows-1252?Q?Re:_Failover_IPv6_with_multiple_PA_prefixes_=28?=
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Thu Oct 21 20:27:38 2010
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <20101021170258.GE61771@macbook.catpipe.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:20:26 -0700
To: Phil Regnauld <regnauld@nsrc.org>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Oct 21, 2010, at 10:02 AM, Phil Regnauld wrote:
> Jeroen Massar (jeroen) writes:
>>
>> Now the problem with such a setup is the many locations where you
>> actually are hardcoding the IP addresses/prefixes into: firewalls, DNS
>> etc. That is the hard part to solve, especially when these services are
>> managed by other parties.
>
> And probably the reason why most won't deploy RA and multiple prefixes.
> Hardcode and NAT, baby!
If you want to hardcode, do it with PI and not NAT.
Owen
