[131255] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: ipv6 vs. LAMP
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dan White)
Thu Oct 21 17:53:10 2010
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 16:53:00 -0500
From: Dan White <dwhite@olp.net>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <20101021214354.GA76784@ussenterprise.ufp.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 21/10/10 14:43 -0700, Leo Bicknell wrote:
>In a message written on Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 01:53:49PM -0700, Christopher McCrory wrote:
>> open to the world. After a few google searches, it seems that
>> PostgreSQL is in a similar situation.
>
>I don't know when PostgreSQL first supported IPv6, but it works just
>fine. I just fired up a stock FreeBSD 8.1 system and built the Postgres
>8.4 port with no changes, and viola:
All this is pretty moot point if you run a localized copy of your database
(mysql or postgres) and connect via unix domains sockets.
--
Dan White
