[131112] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NANOG Digest, Vol 33, Issue 91
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matthew Petach)
Wed Oct 20 15:49:02 2010
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinuCQ+1X8xO-aDctU_GBPFfT6_ZFEGzb7G4p36p@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 12:48:40 -0700
From: Matthew Petach <mpetach@netflight.com>
To: Rudolph Daniel <rudi.daniel@gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Rudolph Daniel <rudi.daniel@gmail.com> wr=
ote:
> We all are waiving flags about the return of one solitary /8 to ARIN, (wh=
ich
> is a good thing) =A0but should we not waive flags about new v6 networks t=
oo?
>
> Let us waive the flags also for the v6 adopters...I think we need to
> evangelize v6 even more than we are already doing.
>
> RD
*heh* If we're going to waive anything, let it be fees. ;D
Waving, on the other hand, would be an exercise best left
to the flags. ^_^;
Matt
(*takes off the pedant hat, and slips back into the darkest corner of the r=
oom*)
