[131054] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Only 5x IPv4 /8 remaining at IANA
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Zaid Ali)
Tue Oct 19 19:25:26 2010
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 16:25:12 -0700
From: Zaid Ali <zaid@zaidali.com>
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20101019225821.D042F5E95BF@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Cc: "Jonas Frey \(Probe Networks\)" <jf@probe-networks.de>,
Jeffrey Lyon <jeffrey.lyon@blacklotus.net>, NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 10/19/10 3:58 PM, "Mark Andrews" <marka@isc.org> wrote:
> Adding is seperate IPv6 server is a work around and runs the risk
> of being overloaded.
And what a wonderful problem to have! You can show a CFO a nice cacti graph
of IPv6 growth so you can justify him/her to sign off on IPv6 expenses. A
CFO will never act unless there is a real business problem. There are some
of us here who have management with clue but there are many that don't,
sadly this is the majority and a large contributor to the slow adoption of
IPv6.
Zaid
