[131027] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Doug Barton)
Tue Oct 19 12:38:48 2010

Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 09:38:36 -0700
From: Doug Barton <dougb@dougbarton.us>
To: Dan White <dwhite@olp.net>
In-Reply-To: <20101019132430.GA2771@dan.olp.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

On 10/19/2010 6:24 AM, Dan White wrote:
> But I still feel strongly that a /48 assignment model for residential
> customers is right for our environment.

Perfectly reasonable. If you've analyzed your situation and come to that 
conclusion who am I to argue? Please note, I'm NOT saying, "You must use 
/56 for residential!" I'm saying that reasonable minds can differ, and 
that trying to jam everyone into the /48 mold does more harm than good.


Doug

-- 

Breadth of IT experience, and    |   Nothin' ever doesn't change,
depth of knowledge in the DNS.   |   but nothin' changes much.
Yours for the right price.  :)   |		-- OK Go
http://SupersetSolutions.com/


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post