[131021] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Only 5x IPv4 /8 remaining at IANA

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matthew Walster)
Tue Oct 19 10:53:18 2010

In-Reply-To: <80879.1287493941@localhost>
From: Matthew Walster <matthew@walster.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 15:52:43 +0100
To: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org

On 19 October 2010 14:12,  <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu> wrote:
> Do you *really* want somebody working on your network that gets confused by a
> reference to 213/8 because it's in Class-C space?

I've met people who just assume anything with a 24-bit netmask is a
Class C network. For instance:

"Can I have another Class C out of 83.x please?"

No, and neither can anyone else... What's more is that they'll not use
.0, .255, .1 (because apparently only routers are supposed to use
that), .254 (who knows...)

M


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post