[130983] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Robert E. Seastrom)
Mon Oct 18 20:17:08 2010
To: sthaug@nethelp.no
From: "Robert E. Seastrom" <rs@seastrom.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 20:16:59 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20101018.202020.41637336.sthaug@nethelp.no> (sthaug@nethelp.no's
message of "Mon, 18 Oct 2010 20:20:20 +0200 (CEST)")
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
sthaug@nethelp.no writes:
> I still haven't seen any good argument for why residential users need
> /48s. No, I don't think "that makes all the address assignments the
> same size" is a particularly relevant or convincing argument.
>
> We're doing /56 for residential users, and have no plans to change
> this.
If we were to give a /48 to every human on the face of the planet, we
would use about .000025 of the total available IPv6 address space.
You are to be commended for your leadership in conserving space. Our
children will surely be grateful that thanks to your efforts they have
99.99999% of IPv6 space left to work with rather than the paltry
99.9975% that might have been their inheritance were it not for your
efforts. Bravo!
-r
