[130935] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Definitive Guide to IPv6 adoption
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joel Jaeggli)
Mon Oct 18 13:25:29 2010
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 10:25:10 -0700
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
To: Jack Bates <jbates@brightok.net>
In-Reply-To: <4CBC7F7B.8050600@brightok.net>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 10/18/10 10:10 AM, Jack Bates wrote:
> On 10/18/2010 11:45 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>>
>> More accurately... A /48 per customer end-site...
>>
>
> Define end0-site. Residential customers, for example, don't need more
> than a /56.
This is a matter of opinion not gospel. larger, this size, or smaller
needs to be justified by your deployment plan.
> More would just be obscene. Most small businesses don't need
> more than a /56 either, especially if you are breaking them up into
> different sites (versus assigning a /48 to customer and dividing that
> block up to different sites).
business customers can and will do whatever is necessary to support
their model. I have sought and received a /43 direct assignment for a
business will multiple sites. I have no trouble imagining that my
upstreams would accommodate requests for PA /48s for each location as well.
joel
>
> Jack
>
