[130915] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: Only 5x IPv4 /8 remaining at IANA

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (George Bonser)
Mon Oct 18 11:47:17 2010

Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 08:47:06 -0700
In-Reply-To: <20101018153551.GA28093@nudo.bsws.de>
From: "George Bonser" <gbonser@seven.com>
To: "Henning Brauer" <hb-nanog@bsws.de>,
	<nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henning Brauer=20
> Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 8:36 AM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Only 5x IPv4 /8 remaining at IANA
>=20
> instead of working on a viable alternative that doesn't suck.
> Which is certainly possible.

I would say that at this point it is too late to resist v6 deployment
but it might be a good time to work on the "next thing" and use v6 as an
example of how not to do it next time.

It certainly is going to present some security challenges for some
folks, particularly the ones that have been using dynamic nat pools to,
in effect, block inbound connections. Firewall vendors are going to see
a windfall from v6, I think.

G


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post