|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikW5pwaYFXhPs2WBXz_r53znr9bBXVj=pK1Mz52@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 00:13:14 -0700 From: Shacolby Jackson <shacolby@bluejeansnet.com> To: Ken Gilmour <ken.gilmour@gmail.com> Cc: nanog@nanog.org Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org I have used UltraDNS before. They are decent. I am however evaluating Dynec= t (www.dyn.com) who are very popular with social media companies like Twitter= . On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 11:17 PM, Ken Gilmour <ken.gilmour@gmail.com> wrote= : > On 18 October 2010 06:53, Jonas Bj=F6rklund <jonas@bjorklund.cn> wrote: > > > > > I have worked for one of the biggest poker networks and we used UltraDN= S. > > The company was first operated from Sweden and later Austria. > > > > /Jonas > > > > I would tend to agree... I have also used UltraDNS in the past for other > companies, however we needed them urgently and someone else responded > faster > and they seem to be doing a good job so far. > > Regards, > > Ken >
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |