[130852] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: network name 101100010100110.net
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Day Domes)
Sun Oct 17 01:24:35 2010
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinWE8X+A2vK3SCRswDLmnY5xiJxgr0Yd6FaC-y4@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 01:24:25 -0400
From: Day Domes <daydomes@gmail.com>
To: Joe Hamelin <joe@nethead.com>, nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 1:03 AM, Joe Hamelin <joe@nethead.com> wrote:
> 16 bit integers. =A0Ok, a lame joke.
>
> 22694.NET and 58A6.NET are available. =A0What are you trying to name?
>
>
> --
> Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474
>
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Day Domes <daydomes@gmail.com> wrote:
>> unsigned?
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 12:59 AM, Joe Hamelin <joe@nethead.com> wrote:
>>> On Saturday night, Day Domes <daydomes@gmail.com> postulated:
>>>> I am thinking of using 101100010100110.net does anyone see
>>>> any issues with this?
>>>
>>>
>>> It's truly unsigned?
>>> (15 bit)
>>>
>>> --
>>> Joe Hamelin, W7COM, Tulalip, WA, 360-474-7474
>>>
>>
>
A new network that we are going to use to connect all are global data
centers and also use to peer with other networks to push data to the
Internet
