[130844] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Choice of network space when numbering interfaces with IPv6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Sat Oct 16 20:56:50 2010
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 01:56:28 +0100
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net>
In-Reply-To: <20101016222654.728261CC3E@ptavv.es.net>
Cc: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
>>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-6man-prefixlen-p2p-00.txt
>> Drafts are drafts, and nothing more, aren't they?
must be some blowhard i have plonked
> Drafts are drafts. Even most RFCs are RFCs and nothing more. Only a
> handful have ever been designated as "Standards". I hope this becomes
> one of those in the hope it will be taken seriously. (It already is by
> anyone with a large network running IPv6.)
juniper and cisco implement today
randy
