[130809] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Choice of network space when numbering interfaces with IPv6
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Zaid Ali)
Fri Oct 15 16:02:53 2010
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:02:22 -0700
From: Zaid Ali <zaid@zaidali.com>
To: Zaid Ali <zaid@zaidali.com>,
NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <C8DDF8E5.63178%zaid@zaidali.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Bahh had my head turned around and brain fried on a Friday. I was more
curious about /64 vs /126 from management perspective. Thanks everyone for
answering offline as well, I got my questions answered.
Zaid
On 10/15/10 12:26 PM, "Zaid Ali" <zaid@zaidali.com> wrote:
> SO I have been turning up v6 with multiple providers now and notice that
> some choose /64 for numbering interfaces but one I came across use a /126. A
> /126 is awfully large (for interface numbering) and I am curious if there is
> some rationale behind using a /126 instead of a /64.
>
> Zaid
>
>
>
