[130396] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: ARIN Fraud Reporting Form ... (Resource listings yes,
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (George Bonser)
Fri Oct 1 23:20:45 2010
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 20:20:35 -0700
In-Reply-To: <4DB05053-FCD4-4459-B226-991435E90C65@arin.net>
From: "George Bonser" <gbonser@seven.com>
To: "John Curran" <jcurran@arin.net>,
"Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@tristatelogic.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> We will shortly be providing a "list of number resources with no valid
> POC"
> for those who desire it (per the current bulk Whois policy.)
>=20
> > If you can put an annotation into a whois records for a POC,
> > saying explicity that you can't get ahold of this person, then it
> would
> > seem to me to be a rather trivial matter of programming to
transplant
> > a very similar sort of annotation into each and every IP block or AS
> > record that has that same specific POC record as one of its
> associated
> > POC records, either Admin, or Technical, or whatever.
>=20
> Also a nice idea, and one that I've taken as a formal suggestion for
> improvement.
>=20
Those two things would be enough for me for the numbers covered by
agreement, the legacy issue is a tougher nut. There should be some sort
of requirement that any network being announced have a valid point of
contact. Whose jurisdiction that would fall under for a global Internet
beats me.
