[130290] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: RIP Justification
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Heath Jones)
Thu Sep 30 19:06:49 2010
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=Q6odcyAtrzK=+M6dUL-siQre0XVqpP6nfcTPY@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 00:06:22 +0100
From: Heath Jones <hj1980@gmail.com>
To: Jack Carrozzo <jack@crepinc.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Haha It's all good :)
You are right about IS-IS being less resource intensive than OSPF, and
that it scales better!
On 30 September 2010 23:50, Jack Carrozzo <jack@crepinc.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Both OSPF and IS-IS use Dijkstra. IS-IS isn't as widely used because
>> of the ISO addressing. Atleast thats my take on it..
>
> Sorry, my mistake. I'll go sit in my corner now...
> -Jack
