[130278] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: AT&T Dry Pairs?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bret Clark)
Thu Sep 30 18:12:57 2010
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 18:12:47 -0400
From: Bret Clark <bclark@spectraaccess.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin3feaJSskhRbXLwQGSfST2LmSkxXhSJnL7tNqL@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
If the buildings are a 100ft apart, can't you just go with a wireless
connection? Speeds would probably be better and no monthly fee!
On 09/30/2010 06:08 PM, Robert Johnson wrote:
> If your sales contact don't know what an alarm circuit is, go find
> AT&T's tariff filed with your state's PUC. It will contain the name of the
> service. This will take some digging...
>
> Verizon Maryland calls this an "Intraexchange local channel, regular voice
> grade" and they go for $15.53/month. There are a plethora of different types
> of "dry pairs" that you can order depending on the signal bandwidth of the
> circuit and allowed attenuation.
>
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Brandon Galbraith<
> brandon.galbraith@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Has anyone had any luck lately getting dry pairs from AT&T? I'm in the
>> Chicago area attempting to get a dry pair between two buildings (100ft
>> apart) for some equipment, but when speaking to several folks at AT&T the
>> response I get is "You want AT&T service without the service? That's not
>> logical!". Had no problems 3-4 years ago getting these sorts of "circuits",
>> but it appears it's gone the way of the dodo now. Any emails off-list are
>> appreciated.
>>
>> --
>> Brandon Galbraith
>> US Voice: 630.492.0464
>>
>>
