[130273] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: AT&T Dry Pairs?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (George Bonser)
Thu Sep 30 17:30:33 2010
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 14:30:22 -0700
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=5eOZK5AhyUiPaHwZb2-U4_vDFGtVBL4aZ117b@mail.gmail.com>
From: "George Bonser" <gbonser@seven.com>
To: "Brandon Galbraith" <brandon.galbraith@gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ryan Shea=20
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 2:21 PM
> To: Brandon Galbraith
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: AT&T Dry Pairs?
>=20
> Years ago I managed to get a dry pair from Verizon for some homebrew
> DSL,
> but there was some telco specific term for the dry pair, like "series
7
> alarm circuit" or something. AT&T may have their own term.
>=20
> -Ryan
>=20
Just plain "alarm circuit" works in most cases but it has been a while
here as well.
