[130266] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: RIP Justification
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nathan Eisenberg)
Thu Sep 30 16:16:40 2010
From: Nathan Eisenberg <nathan@atlasnetworks.us>
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 20:16:10 +0000
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikZFLU0cNxC1r_6y0hbYS9virZPRz2mTtwZU5LF@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> Seriously though, I can't think of a topology I've ever encountered where=
RIP
> would have made more sense than OSPF or BGP, or if you're really die-hard=
,
> IS-IS. Let it die...
I was just curious - why would IS-IS be more die-hard than OSPF or iBGP?
Best Regards,
Nathan Eisenberg
