[130190] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: RIP Justification
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (George Bonser)
Wed Sep 29 16:40:48 2010
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:37:27 -0700
In-Reply-To: <003801cb6014$fd2f0280$f78d0780$@edu>
From: "George Bonser" <gbonser@seven.com>
To: "Gary Gladney" <gladney@stsci.edu>,
<nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gary Gladney=20
> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 1:29 PM
> To: 'Jesse Loggins'; nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: RE: RIP Justification
>=20
> with RIP you do lose the ability to use variable bit
> masks
> (CIDR) and faster routing algorithms like DUAL used in Cisco routers
> and I'm
> not a big fan of OSPF.
>=20
> Gary
I would think most people using RIP with IPv4 would use RIPv2 which does
allow CIDR.
