[130099] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Randy in Nevis
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Seth Mattinen)
Tue Sep 28 11:19:52 2010
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 08:19:35 -0700
From: Seth Mattinen <sethm@rollernet.us>
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <F19CD6F5-7CB9-4884-ADEF-7CED1E8887DC@icann.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 9/28/10 7:49 AM, Leo Vegoda wrote:
> On 27 Sep 2010, at 8:29, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> 465 is not an odd-ball port, it's the standard well-known port for STMPS.
>
> It is? That's not what's recorded at: http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers
>
> urd 465/tcp URL Rendesvous Directory for SSM
> igmpv3lite 465/udp IGMP over UDP for SSM
>
Microsoft frequently has different ideas about things.
~Seth
