|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:10:03 +0200 (CEST) From: Ingo Flaschberger <if@xip.at> To: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=GTmhYS6d0pYLTFLmLAtBRb1HCPopwAYHqoVdi@mail.gmail.com> Cc: nanog@nanog.org Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org >>> But it seems, that NetFPGA has not enough memory to hold a full view >>> (current 340k routes). >> >> It's just a development platform for prototyping designs, not >> something you would use in production... >> I want to use it to implement and test ideas that I have, and play >> with some different forwarding architectures, not use it as a final >> product :) > > also, does a datacenter router/switch need a full table? isn't that > the job of the peering/transit routers in your scheme? In my small network the datacenter router is also the peering/transit router.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |