[130] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: US Domain -- County Delegations
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Traina)
Tue Aug 1 03:42:57 1995
To: Paul A Vixie <paul@vix.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 31 Jul 1995 23:42:54 PDT."
<9508010642.AA07581@gw.home.vix.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 1995 00:39:37 -0700
From: Paul Traina <pst@cisco.com>
> For a smaller company, or one with less offices, it might make
>sense for their domain name to be geographical, for example cisco.sf.ca.us
>or nytimes.ny.us.
Excuse me, but both companies mentioned are multinational...even "small"
companies are geographically disparate.
I think we all agree heirarchy==good.
The thing we haven't figured out yet is how to apply that heirarchy in an
inoffensive way. Geography is not a good choice, it has the pungent smell
of europe in the 1800's (aka ISO). ISP would be a good choice if it were
constant and there was a true heirarchy there.
Just to be obnoxious, let me state the ugly obvious programatic mapping...
use the first 2 or 3 letters in the 2nd layer domain name.
cisco.com = cisco.ci.com
nytimes.com = nytimes.ny.com
real-routers.com = real-routers.re.com
Since this is a purely implied and programatic mapping, the particularly
-cute- thing we can do is automagicly map this crud so no user ever has
to see the abomonation "cisco.ci.com".
We have certainly taken a solid whack at the root DNS server
overload "problem". The disadvantage is we haven't solved the
namespace collision problem, but I see that as one for the lawyers
to solve, not us bit twiddlers.
