[129989] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: OpenFlow
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matlock, Kenneth L)
Fri Sep 24 17:42:18 2010
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 15:41:59 -0600
In-Reply-To: <4C9D188F.2050802@unfix.org>
From: "Matlock, Kenneth L" <MatlockK@exempla.org>
To: "Jeroen Massar" <jeroen@unfix.org>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
Which is fine and all (being that it's on-topic). My main beef is that a
certain person can't take a hint. Using an 'anonymous' re-mailer to try
and get people to read nothing more than copy/paste, and then 5 billion
'references' (most of which use asinine 'docs.google.com' references
instead of the actual document) strikes me as unprofessional at the
least, if not infantile.
I'd have thought he'd have learned the last 50 times he got smacked down
for this. But of course, I'm just an ignorant American! :)
Ken Matlock
Network Analyst
Exempla Healthcare
(303) 467-4671
matlockk@exempla.org
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeroen Massar [mailto:jeroen@unfix.org]=20
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 3:31 PM
To: Matlock, Kenneth L
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: OpenFlow
On 2010-09-24 23:25, Matlock, Kenneth L wrote:
> Wow, resorting to using a spoofed email address to propagate your
spam,
> and forget to remove your .sig
>=20
> Some people just don't take a hint, do they? I know which software
> package I WON'T be recommending to anyone (in fact, quite the
opposite!)
And also, there is a nice agenda item at NANOG50;
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog50/abstracts.php?pt=3DMTY2OSZuYW5vZzUw=
&
nm=3Dnanog50
8<-----------------------------------------------------------------
Track: Open Flow
Nick McKeown, Stanford University; Matt Davy, Indiana University
Presentation Date: October 4, 2010, 4:30 PM - 6:00 PM
Abstract:
OpenFlow: An Update
[..]
OpenFlow Trials and Deployments
----------------------------------------------------------------->8
Thus as it is a NANOG-ish topic, I wonder why somebody needs to hide.
Greets,
Jeroen
