[129695] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: XO Routing
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Patrick W. Gilmore)
Thu Sep 16 13:00:24 2010
From: "Patrick W. Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
In-Reply-To: <20100916094837.O46129@clockwork>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 12:54:59 -0400
To: NANOG list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On Sep 16, 2010, at 12:48 PM, Stefan Molnar wrote:
> My sales director said it was their peering.
First problem with a statement talking about technical problems: "My =
sales director said...."
Second problem: "Peering" does not cause internal routing loops. Er, =
should not.
Third problem: "Was".
--=20
TTFN,
patrick
> On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, Chris Woodfield wrote:
>=20
>> The unconfirmed chatter I'm hearing is that they were leaking peering =
routes to other peers. Can anyone check and confirm this? Renesys?
>>=20
>> -C
>>=20
>> On Sep 16, 2010, at 9:09 12AM, William Byrd wrote:
>>=20
>>> XO Engineers are telling us that they are aware of packet loss =
across their
>>> network and are looking into it. We're experiencing slow/degraded
>>> connectivity out of St. Louis and Nashville but Atlanta and Dallas =
are
>>> problem free.
>>>=20
>>> William Collier-Byrd
>>> will@collier-byrd.net
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore =
<patrick@ianai.net>wrote:
>>>=20
>>>> This should probably be on outages@, but XO is definitely having =
problems
>>>> to places like speedtest.com & RCN from Boston.
>>>>=20
>>>> --
>>>> TTFN,
>>>> patrick
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>> On Sep 16, 2010, at 11:59 AM, Charles Mills wrote:
>>>>=20
>>>>> The internet health report is showing high latency to most of =
their
>>>> peers.
>>>>>=20
>>>>> Chuck.
>>>>>=20
>>>>> On Sep 16, 2010 11:57 AM, "Stefan Molnar" <stefan@csudsu.com> =
wrote:
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> Anyone know the impact on the XO Routing/Peering that is =
happening right
>>>>>> now? We have had spotty connectivity for the last hour.
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>> Stefan
>>>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>=20
