[129572] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: List of Teredo servers and teredo relays
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jeroen Massar)
Sat Sep 11 16:54:50 2010
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 22:54:29 +0200
From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org>
To: Jeff Kell <jeff-kell@utc.edu>
In-Reply-To: <4C8BE509.1090904@utc.edu>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
On 2010-09-11 22:22, Jeff Kell wrote:
[..]
> What is currently "breaking" things is the preference of IPv6 over
> IPv4. If you're running a default Win2K8 active directory, it's
> publishing all of it's goodies for login in IPv6 form complete with AAAA
> address records. If your network isn't end-to-end IPv6 compliant, but
> some Win7 client across the hall (on another subnet) has found *any*
> IPv6 connectivity (6to4, Teredo, doesn't matter how good/bad/ugly/slow),
> it is going to try to communicate with the domain controller over that
> IPv6 connection. I have seen this in action, and stacks of trouble
> tickets of slow / intermittent / no connectivity with the domain.
It would be nice that if you make these kind of statements that you
would have actually read up on things which are active already for a
long long time.
Please try google and read up on RFC 3484.
Indeed, Teredo is prioritized AFTER native IPv4.
Greets,
Jeroen
