[129563] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Convenience or slippery slope... or something else?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Leigh Porter)
Fri Sep 10 18:05:31 2010
From: Leigh Porter <leigh.porter@ukbroadband.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.1009101339520.5148@soloth.lewis.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 23:05:04 +0100
To: Jon Lewis <jlewis@lewis.org>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
You need to go to qqwqaaqws.ipq.co to find out more...
On 10 Sep 2010, at 18:44, Jon Lewis wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Sep 2010, Reese wrote:
>=20
>> A friend brought this to my attention:
>>=20
>> http://ipq.co/
>>=20
>> He saw it at http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3D1678324
>>=20
>> I'm not sure whether to shriek in joy or in pain. Will data from
>> this service - if it is a worthy service - propagate properly?
>> Play nicely with or break other people's toys? Is it a gimmick?
>=20
> How's it going to break anything? I just created one...
>=20
> tentententen.ipq.co. 86400 IN A 10.10.10.10
>=20
> so...now I can use tentententen.ipq.co as a name that resolves to =
10.10.10.10...assuming I trust ipq.co to keep that A record and not =
delete or change it at some point. Other than the fact that you can't =
change it[1], how is this any different (other than being less useful) =
or scarier than DynDNS?
>=20
>=20
> 1. EMAIL ADDRESS
> optional, but will allow you to update the record later (once we =
implement it)
>=20
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Jon Lewis, MCP :) | I route
> Senior Network Engineer | therefore you are
> Atlantic Net |
> _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
>=20
