[129312] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: largest OSPF core
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Deepak Jain)
Thu Sep 2 17:32:49 2010
From: Deepak Jain <deepak@ai.net>
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 17:32:30 -0400
In-Reply-To: <E0E180BC-04F6-4EEB-A7B1-6C8B439C9B28@delong.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
.
> >
> > With respect to these OSPF questions, how many people are running two
> OSPF processes on each router (v4 and v6) to support dual stack rather
> than migrating (or just enjoying their existing) ISIS (OSI)
> implementations?
> >
> You left out the option of using ospf3 to do both v4 and v6. Works on
> juniper and foundry at least.
>=20
> Owen
http://www.cisco.com/web/strategy/docs/gov/OSPFv3_aag.pdf
Thank you. Apparently Cisco supports it (or something like it) too.
Deepak
